A Quieter Fed, And A Higher Bar For Standing Pat

Read the entire Forbes article here:

A Quieter Fed, And A Higher Bar for Standing Pat

---

Kevin Warsh opened his first Jackson Hole speech as Federal Reserve chairman with a joke. His outline, he said, could be called "a trail map . . . just don’t call it forward guidance." Markets ignored the joke and raised the odds of a hike. Fed funds futures implied a roughly 56% chance of a September increase, about 20 percentage points higher than a day earlier, and the two-year Treasury yield rose nearly 8 basis points to 4.31%, according to CNBC. That is the news. The lasting point is institutional: after a muddy July press conference, Warsh used the speech to define how he will run policy, not what he will do on September 16.

The Inflation Read Markets Heard

The federal funds rate sits at 3.50% to 3.75%, unchanged all year. The latest decision was a 9-3 vote in July to hold. Warsh sees little to fix on labor: unemployment is 4.1%, claims are near multi-decade lows, and low hiring reflects rematching and slow labor-supply growth, not weakn

Prices are the problem. In the figures Warsh cited, PCE inflation is 3.7% over 12 months and 4.1% over six months, and 54% of PCE components rose more than 3% over the past year, against roughly 32% pre-pandemic. Nor are financial conditions doing the Fed's work: investment in equipment and intangibles is up about 9%, S&P 500 profits are up more than 20%, credit spreads are tight, and he would be “hard pressed to describe broad financial conditions as restrictive.”

Then the line that moved the two-year: "While this summer's PCE and CPI readings were better than expected, they do not tell me that underlying trends have meaningfully improved." He also closed July's ambiguity about the target: 2% PCE is "a firm, fixed target," and “price stability is not self-executing, nor is inflation necessarily mean-reverting.”

The Quieter Fed

This is the part that will matter after September. Warsh’s long-standing critique of forward guidance is now operating doctrine. Guidance was essential in 2008, he said, but has "overstayed its welcome" and now "risks creating ambiguity in the name of clarity." If markets trade the Fed's words and the Fed reads market prices, both go blind. He wants unfiltered market signals instead, and he declined to publish a reaction function.

For investors, that means fewer paths and more old-fashioned data dependence. Trading the press conference gets harder. Trading the incoming prints matters more.

Seven Principles, One Idea

Warsh listed seven principles. They reduce to one: a more orthodox, less talkative Fed that treats 2% as a result it must deliver, not a forecast that mean-reverts on its own. Trends over prints. Short-term rates as the "predominant tool." Wage growth "has not proven a reliable indicator of future inflation for a very long time." And the Fed owns the miss: “The responsibility for 65 months of sustained, elevated inflation sits squarely with the central bank.”

AI Is The Long Game, Not An Excuse

Warsh called AI a "hinge point in history" and a possible new factor of production, citing reports of more than $100 billion in annualized token sales at the two leading labs. But he assigned the productivity questions to a task force whose work "will come later and have no bearing on decisions we make in the current policy conjuncture." He is bullish on AI capex. He is not using it to look through 3.7% inflation.

What This Means Into September

The FOMC meets September 15 and 16, with a fresh dot plot due alongside the decision. One jobs report and the August inflation data land first. Warsh’s only policy sentence was that he is "committed to a discipline, not to a decision," paired with his reminder that July's majority had expressed a "joint readiness to act." That is as close as he came to a hike threat, and it is enough.

The politics are real. President Trump nominated Warsh and continues to press for lower rates. Warsh answered with accountability rather than a signal: the 65-month miss sits with the central bank, and nowhere else.

What I am watching: September is a live meeting, not a skip. If Warsh believes policy is not restrictive, a hold that leaves conditions easy is itself a choice. AI capex, in his framing, is demand strength, not a reason to ease. And the September projections will show whether "quieter" means a thinner dot plot or simply a chair who refuses to narrate it.

Chairs usually use Jackson Hole to unveil a framework. Warsh unveiled a posture: less talk, a firm target, and a standard that summer's better-than-expected prints did not meet. Markets heard a possible September hike. What they should underwrite is a chair who expects to be judged on the inflation path, not the elegance of his guidance. As Warsh put it, borrowing from Chuck Yeager: "At the moment of truth, there are either reasons or results."